![]() ![]() A new U-shaped automatic electric toothbrush (UAET) with silicone bristles, fully automatic and with simultaneous action on both arches, has recently been proposed. ![]() #Myst toothbrush reviews manualHowever, all toothbrushes require a certain manual dexterity and care in use. On the contrary, systematic reviews have shown that some electric toothbrushes are more effective in removing bacterial plaque than manual toothbrushes. #Myst toothbrush reviews trialA randomized trial did not reveal significant differences in bacterial plaque removal between 11 different types of manual toothbrushes. Over time, many different types of manual and electric toothbrushes have been produced. Ĭurrently, the toothbrush is not only a device for oral hygiene but also an accessory that accompanies people in their common life by influencing their uses and habits. This is done mainly by using a toothbrush at home. An important factor for their prevention is the control of pathogenic microorganisms contained in bacterial biofilm deposited on dental surfaces. Gingivitis, periodontitis, and dental caries are the most frequent oral diseases. Conclusions: The U-shaped automatic electric toothbrush tested in this study proved to be not effective in removing dental plaque. The differences between treatments in clean mouth VAS was statistically significant ( p < 0.0001) favoring the P and H groups. On the contrary, the difference between the U and N groups was not significant (difference 5 95% CI from −2 to 12) favoring the U group. The differences were statistically significant between the U and P groups (difference −48 95% CI from −54 to −41) favoring the P group, and between the U and H groups (difference −45 95% CI from −52 to −39) favoring the H group. The differences between treatments in FMPS reduction after brushing were statistically significant ( p < 0.0001). Results: Twenty-two participants were randomized to the treatments in the four periods of the study. Mixed models were performed for difference in FMPS and VAS. The secondary outcome variable was a visual analogic scale (VAS) on subjective clean mouth sensation. Primary outcome measure was the reduction in full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) after brushing. Methods: Eligible participants were volunteer students. Background: The aim of this single-use, four-treatment, four-period (visit), cross-over, mono-centered, examiner-blind, cross-over randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy in dental plaque removal of a U-shaped automatic electric toothbrush (U) compared to a conventional powered toothbrush (P), a habitual toothbrushing procedure (H), and no brushing (N). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |